The i dot in Figure 8 is exactly above the stem. This is the sign of accuracy, perfection, excellent judgment, excellent memory, and mighty faithfulness to details. This writer often has a matter-of-fact personality. He is not only cautious in dotting the i, but places it exactly where it belongs...
When the capital letter I-the ego-is written huge, this is the image the writer has of himself. Surely he is unconditionally egocentric, a megalomaniac.
A block letter shows culture, someone who reads. This is the capital I found in most books.
The unadorned I shows nothing extra and similarly indicates the person who sticks to the simplest essentials.
The large, ugly I past hooks is the sign of pride and greed. This writer is every out for himself, delightful to avoid responsibilities.
The I that looks thesame to the number 1 shows a link to numbers. Often these people are found to excel in mathematics.
When the I dot is to the right, it is referred to as the make known placed i dot. This writer's thoughts govern in tummy of his actions, and his writing shows speed. His urge is to finish his task without worrying not quite exact details.
The pre-placed i dot, which is to the left, shows procrastination, caution, want of self-confidence, repression. The left, represents the afterward (the writer lives in the past), whereas the i dot to the right of the stem-the post-placed- i dot represents the future.
The exactly placed I dot above the stem is the sign of accuracy, perfection, excellent judgment, excellent memory, strong adherence to details. This writer often has a matter-of-fact personality. He is not deserted careful in dotting the i, but places it exactly where it belongs. This shows concentration. Many panel of adjudicators and scientists dot their i's in this fashion.
The i dots which are exactly above the i stem are often found accompanied by people who are considered severely moral people. They usually consent strongly conservative points of view, in contrast to the writers of the post-placed i dots, who are more likely to be liberals. The post-placed writer lets himself go, whereas the exacting writer weighs every action.
The high-flying dot shows the person whose thoughts are high in the sky. He is generally unrealistic, but if he attains his improbable goals, he does therefore in a big way.
When an i dot is not in reality a dot, but a vertical line, it is a sign of criticism, of a person who has a strong concern taking into consideration principles. Not by yourself does the have emotional impact of the dot seem similar to a descending knife, but it can in addition to pass for an exclamation point, demonstrating emphasis.
An i dot formed of a circle reflects the eccentric-sometimes mildly so, sometimes not for that reason mildly. These people put on an act serene neurotic tendencies and are frequently unable to position reality. They go after fads quite often and are of an artistic nature. The late player Walt Disney wrote a same i dot. It is engaging that his circled i dot looks unconditionally thesame to Mickey Mouse's round ears.
The completely blithe 'i' dot indicates a want of willpower, possibly swine sickness or even illness, as if the person did not have the strength to dot the i properly. (A lively t bar obviously shows the similar meaning.)
When we see an i dot joined to choice letter (and for that matter, any letter that requires a dot or bar), it shows a smart fascination of thoughts-doing two things in one shot, thus to speak. These are the personalities of chess players, people who can solve abstract and intricate puzzles and create systematic deductions.
When the i dot is an arc that opens at the left side, it is a sign of the neurotic, unreliable personality. He shies away from the system. The arc, which is regarded as the eye, is looking toward the left indicating a deficiency of trust in somebody he has been operational past in the recent past. (It is often the undependable person who does not trust others)
When the i dot is in the form of an arc log on to the right, it is the sign of the observer. The arc itself looks with an eye staring at something.
When the dot is directly greater than the stem and heavy, it indicates good memory, hermetic judgment, and the endowment to reach detail work. You often locate this writer to be no question grasping and in a come clean of depression. (Heaviness in writing shows the physical, and the physical brings upon materialism.) just about the depression, it seems to be a weight on the writer's head, carrying an supplementary load.
When the dots are more next dashes, they signify energy, worry, and irritability. If you go exceeding these dots yourself, you can all but tone liveliness, irritability, and then a sure degree of speed. gone the i needs a dot and truthfulness is really necessary, this writer flings his pen in such a impression as to create the dots into dashes. It shows he does not care, because there is something bothering him.
When the i dots look more behind commas or arcs, they are signs of humor, wit, and gaiety. If you see nearby at them, they resemble smiling mouths.
An i without a dot may simply indicate quickness (which would have to be checked bearing in mind the stop of the writing). Otherwise, the dotless i shows forgetfulness, carelessness, neglect. This is along with real of the t bar without the bar.
A note about genius: There is no hard-and-fast consider for recognizing genius through a person's handwriting. However, definite signs often realize appear in the script of great-minded men: tall upper-zone development (without loops), and/or totally small, or even microscopic, center zones. (There is no particular guideline to the humiliate zones.)
Generally speaking, past the center zone is the social area, the larger it is, the less the powers of concentration. Thus, the great mind tends to pretense in his handwriting a willingness to present up the social world for more intense powers of concentration.
Since the average size of a zone is 3 millimeters, all below this size we call small and the smaller in size it gets, the stronger the concentration, usually at the expense of sociability.
Other traits commonly found in the handwriting of the genius are tremendous readiness and sloppiness, indicating that the person's thinking is in view of that far afield ahead of his writing that he has no era for meticulous penmanship.
Although a genius may viewpoint many of his t bars and i dots without difficulty to the right of the stem, he will place others past good precision, for, however snappishly he may be thinking, much of his measure requires exactitude as well as speed.
A form that frequently turns occurring in the writing of someone with a high IQ is a g made in the touch of a figure 8, showing swiftness pro a clear grace.
May we digress to the subject of legibility?
The fact of legibility in handwriting and its degree are not in view of that simple to establish. We edit total words at a time, some of us entire sum phrases. Consequently, one or even several illegible letters in a word will not prevent us from correctly guessing what the word is from the context. As experienced readers, we really get not mind a not wholly legible hand. As graphologists, we must be less lenient.
To confirm the legibility of handwriting, we must try to approach it word by word. abandoned as soon as handwriting proves to be legible in a word-by-word study can it be pronounced legible.
To interpret a hand graphologically, on the basis of its legibility, we must question ourselves why a person may choose to write, yet at the same time write illegibly. Lip give support to is the phrase that comes first to our mind. To let the gesture stand for the war is the intent of one who writes but does hence illegibly. Or he may deem himself consequently complex that reading his missive is the recipient's duty; egotism and arrogance, therefore, may as a consequence lead to illegible handwriting.
Or we may write the declaration while we would choose to keep its contents to ourselves. In this case, it may be affectation of mysteriousness, or neurotic anxiety, or psychotic suspiciousness, or perhaps even a persecution highbrow that blurs our hand. It was distrust that created cipher or code writing.
Paranoia or persecution mania, to be sure, does not create handwriting wholly illegible. upon the contrary, paranoiacs often write meticulously legibly, as though exasperating their best not to inflame any suspicion. But there simultaneously appear clear solitary illegible characters or words;
they see in the manner of corrections, but the result is always approaching given illegibility. Paranoiacs seem to be feverishly bent on improving themselves and apprehensive over what might be misinterpreted and criticized by others, but it probably is portion of their mental disease not to succeed but rather to make things yet worse.
A person bearing in mind an illegible or neglected hand cannot be called either sincere or co-operative. For if he has nothing to hide, or really wants to be understood by his neighbor, why should he write illegibly? We must agree to that he does not care whether or not we can door his letter. This is not the pretentiousness of a considerate person. Indeed, inconsiderateness, carelessness, (in clothing, too), insincerity, and even bad manners may be observed in people in imitation of barely legible hands. completely probably, they would as a consequence be unpunctual, disorderly, and indolent. There was a period past well-educated people, and especially intellectuals, thought it beneath them to write a legible handwriting. Freud has, I think, interpreted the illegible hand of doctors, for instance, as allocation of their professional self-importance and secretiveness; they do not want the layman to comprehend their comments obviously reserved for supplementary doctors or pharmacists. However, it is quite conceivable that some scientists or thinkers, completely much distant from the world, forget that others may after that hope to approach their writings: (Einstein obviously is not one of these; his handwriting is legible).
People gone tiny training in penmanship complete not write illegibly or carelessly. Their writing may see rather helpless, untrained, but it is often remarkably legible.
A person's illegible signature does not endure of any favorable interpretation. For how much trust can be placed in a document if the signature that is to prove the signer's get-up-and-go to carry out his promises cannot be deciphered? In a sense, an illegible signature annuls the document it pretends to put in force. (Only an anonymous letter or a ransom note goes with ease later an illegible signature.) A special nice of illegible signature, the paraph, is used by people who think they are above the necessity of identifying themselves by means of their signature. The best-known raid is Napoleon and the man afterward Napoleonic aspirations. If a man thinks of himself as one whom everybody must know and blindly obey, why should he activity to write his signature legibly? Indeed, a paraph will suffice. If investigation of the handwriting sample reveals that here and there, one letter stands for marginal enormously plainly, for example, an l for a b or an h for a k, we know from experience that the sample originated following a liar, a swindler, or a cheat.
("Adolf" in Adolf Hitler's signature)
Indistinct figures are made by careless people and people whose attitude in financial matters is not clear. But figures that can be misread, for example, a 5 for an 8, or a 1 for a 7, and therefore on, are united in the manner of fraudulent intentions upon the allowance of the writer.
Legibility, upon the supplementary hand, is characteristic of sincere individuals and of people who have a good power for purposeful work. Legible handwriting may as well as be united next orators, teachers, and pedants; the style value will say us whether the hand is that of a good hypothetical or merely a pedant's.
There are some peculiarities roughly speaking the pace of writing, which we must know in order to attraction perfect conclusions. For instance, Saudek found that high letters, such as f, are always more speedily written than minimum (small) letters, such as i; therefore, a little script is always more reluctantly formed than a sizable one. The rounded letters are produced "without pause," angular formations never without "stopping for a fraction of a second past the transition from one running to the other." The angle writer, therefore, is always a hedger. The similar holds valid of handwriting in imitation of many damage lines, or subsequent to many changes in
direction, particularly left-tending strokes (in a writing movement, which, as ours, is mainly right tending). "No one is skilled of making a dot once writing at a high rate of speed, but will then again fabricate . . . a comma or accent." Similarly, a spontaneous writer will not area the dots exactly more than the i's. upon the additional hand, and no-one else spontaneity can manufacture a straight line, a slowly executed straight heritage inborn necessarily broken. Moreover, spontaneity will always face its writing to the right; upright or left slanted writing is never formed spontaneously.
Examination for Lesson 5
1. What type of capital shows extreme egocentricity?
2. The 'unadorned' capital indicates what type of personality?
3. Which 'i' dot reflects procrastination?
4. Which type of 'i' dot discloses strong faithfulness to details?
5. What does the 'i' dot allied to different letter reveal?
6. Which 'i' dot reveals humor, wit, and gaiety?
7. Intense powers of interest are frequently found in the script of the genius.
Describe this unique type of writing and the zone.
8. Code writing was created because of trust-or the opposite?
9. in imitation of clear forlorn illegible words appear, which type of mania is suggested?
10. Sincerity and co-operating are more likely to be found in legible or illegible script?
A. Legible B. Illegible
11. Who are 'known' to write illegibly thus that the layman will not comprehend their notes?
12. An illegible signature annuls or confirms the document it pretends to put in force?
A. Annuls___ B. Confirms___
13. do spontaneous writers area the dots exactly on top of the 'i's or not?
Answers for Lesson 5
1. One that is enormous
2. The person who sticks to the simplest essentials.
3. The pre-placed i dot
4. The i dot that is exactly above the stem.
5. It shows a smart engagement of thoughts-doing two things in one shot, for that reason to speak. These are the personalities of chess players, people who can solve abstract and intricate puzzles and make rational deductions.
6. i dots that look more gone commas or arcs. (They resemble pleased mouths).
7. categorically small, or even microscopic, middle zones. The middle zone is the social area, the larger it is, the less the powers of concentration. so the good mind tends to produce an effect in his handwriting a willingness to have the funds for happening the social world for more intense powers of concentration.
8. The opposite
9. Paranoia or persecution mania
10. Legible
11. Doctors
12. Annuls
13. They accomplish not area the dots exactly higher than the 'i'.
No comments:
Post a Comment